When the broadcast fails, so does the sponsorship: India shows why

Less than two weeks before kick-off on June 11, FIFA has closed one of its last major broadcast gaps in Asia, confirming China Media Group as the exclusive domestic broadcaster for the 2026 FIFA World Cup in China. The agreement also covers the 2030 World Cup and the FIFA Women’s World Cups in 2027 and 2031.

India remains the only major market without a confirmed rights holder. When that deal closes, it will raise fresh questions about how FIFA is valuing Asian rights relative to European audiences and advertising economics.

China resolved, but at a discount

BestMediaInfo, citing AP and Chinese state-affiliated media, reported that the China rights were valued at about $60 million – well below FIFA’s earlier expectation of around $300 million. FIFA has not disclosed the fee. Even so, the figure is likely to be treated as a benchmark: the market that delivered the largest digital World Cup audience in 2022 appears to have been cleared at a price comparable to what India’s previous broadcaster paid for a smaller cycle.

China Media Group, the state-affiliated conglomerate that includes CCTV (China Central Television), provides FIFA with broad national reach across television and digital platforms. The late-stage close – at an apparent discount to FIFA’s opening position – is expected to shape the next negotiation.

India: the last open market, and the hardest close

India has become the more complicated case. Reuters reported that FIFA cut its asking price from about $100 million to $35 million for the India package covering the 2026 and 2030 World Cups. No buyer has agreed.

JioStar – the Reliance-Disney joint venture that dominates Indian sports media – made two offers, Reuters reported: about $20 million for the full package, followed by a reported Rs 25 crore (about €2.8 million at current exchange rates) for digital rights only. FIFA rejected both. Doordarshan, the public broadcaster, offered around Rs 5 crore (about €550,000 at current exchange rates) for knockout-stage matches only. Sony, the rights holder in 2014 and 2018, reviewed the opportunity and did not bid.

The commercial headwinds are largely structural. BestMediaInfo reported that more than 87 percent of the tournament’s 104 matches will start after 10 pm IST because of North American time zones, leaving about 13 matches – roughly 12.5 percent of the schedule – in Indian daytime hours. In 2022, when Qatar’s match times were favorable, the tournament generated more than Rs 300 crore (about €33 million at current exchange rates) in advertising revenue across deals with more than 50 brands, BestMediaInfo reported. That model is harder to replicate in a late-night cycle, and Indian sports broadcasting remains highly dependent on advertising rather than subscription revenue.

New routes into an unresolved market

With traditional bidders holding back, new options are being explored. Amazon Prime and YouTube Premium have been discussed as potential digital-first contenders for India streaming rights. YouTube already has a “Preferred Platform” arrangement with FIFA for 2026, allowing rights holders to stream the first 10 minutes of every match and select full matches on YouTube channels. The deal does not make YouTube an India rights holder, but it gives FIFA a ready-made digital framework as the conventional market stalls.

How the rest of the world is watching

Elsewhere, deals have largely been secured months or years in advance. The US agreement, at about $1.25 billion, was set early in the cycle. European public broadcasters coordinated through the EBU (European Broadcasting Union) for free-to-air coverage across multiple territories. Australia confirmed all 104 matches on SBS at no cost to viewers. China is now in the confirmed column. India is not.

FIFA World Cup 2026: The Business of the Beautiful Game

How brands, retailers, and the sports economy compete on football’s biggest stage.

Explore Our Coverage →