Lululemon’s Schroders Capital renewable fund marks a shift from pledges to capital deployment. The fund targets full renewable equivalence for its Chinese suppliers by 2030. Only six apparel brands globally provide direct supply chain renewable financing.

Lululemon has committed capital to a new renewable energy fund targeting wind and solar development across mainland China, in a move designed to cover the equivalent of its entire supplier electricity footprint in the country by 2030.

The fund is managed by Schroders Capital’s infrastructure team, with Schroders Greencoat – one of the largest dedicated renewable energy infrastructure managers globally – serving as adviser to the strategy. Capital has already been deployed across multiple wind projects currently under construction, with completion expected later this year. Lululemon says participation in the fund will enable the equivalent of 100 percent renewable electricity across its Chinese supplier network, calibrated against projected electricity consumption in 2030.

China is the pressure point for Scope 3 decarbonization

Supply chain decarbonization has become one of the most structurally difficult problems in apparel. Scope 3 emissions – those generated by suppliers rather than the brand itself – typically represent more than 90 percent of a fashion company’s total carbon footprint, and the grids powering major manufacturing hubs in Asia remain heavily coal-dependent.

Pooled investment vehicles like this fund represent an emerging attempt to resolve a classic collective action problem: individual brands lack the scale to drive grid-level change on their own, but their combined procurement demand can underwrite new capacity.

The investment directly advances Lululemon’s science-based target (SBT) to reduce Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity by 60 percent by 2030 against a 2018 baseline: a commitment aligned with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) framework. It also fulfills a prior pledge to achieve 50 percent renewable electricity use across core tier 1 and 2 suppliers by 2030, a target set in part following sustained pressure from environmental advocacy group Stand.earth.

Lululemon — Scope 3 emissions: targets & progress
Latest disclosed data (2023 impact report, published September 2024)
Metric Value Baseline / year Target year Notes
Scope 3 share of total footprint 99.7% 2023 Scope 1 & 2 = 0.3% of total
Total Scope 3 emissions (absolute) 1,733 kt CO₂e 2023 Up 2.5% vs 2022 (1,691 kt); absolute emissions rising
Scope 3 reduction target (intensity) -60% 2018 2030 SBTi-aligned; intensity = tCO₂e per $m gross profit¹
Progress vs target (intensity) -31% 2018 baseline Purchased goods & services only; absolute manufacturing emissions +20% vs 2022¹
Renewable electricity – suppliers (actual) 14% 2023 (7% in 2022) Core Tier 1 & 2 suppliers; 15% reported in 2024²
Interim supplier target (2025) 25% 2025 Target missed: 15% reported for 2024²
Renewable electricity target – suppliers (2030) 50% 2030 Core Tier 1 & 2; electricity only (excludes thermal processes)
Long-term net-zero goal ≥90% absolute reduction 2018 2050 Scope 1, 2 & 3; residual emissions via carbon removal; SBTi Net-Zero Standard

Source: Lululemon 2023 Impact Report (Sept. 2024); Lululemon 2024 Impact Report (Nov. 2025); Lululemon 2025 CDP disclosure. ¹Intensity-based progress figures are per million USD gross profit; absolute Scope 3 emissions rose year-on-year. ²2024 figure from Trellis/Lululemon 2024 Impact Report; 2025 interim target of 25% not met.

Competition Bureau complaint forced Lululemon to revise green messaging

In 2024, Stand.earth filed a complaint with Canada’s Competition Bureau alleging that Lululemon had misled consumers with environmental claims insufficiently backed by action. During the course of the investigation, the company removed material green messaging from its digital channels, most visibly amending the brand positioning phrase “Be Planet” to simply “Planet.” The Competition Bureau subsequently closed the investigation.

Few apparel brands back supply chain renewables with direct capital

The latest Fossil Free Fashion Scorecard published by Stand.earth identified only six companies, among them H&M, Bestseller, and PVH, as providing any direct financing for supply chain renewable energy projects.

The report put the problem in stark terms: fashion accounts for at least 4 percent of global climate pollution, with manufacturing processes disproportionately dependent on coal and fossil fuels. Lululemon’s fund investment would place it in that same small cohort of brands making financial commitments rather than procurement pledges alone.

The investment adds to existing Lululemon sustainability partnerships with the Apparel Impact Institute, the Asia Clean Energy Coalition (ACEC), and the Clean Energy Buyers Association’s (CEBA) Clean Energy Procurement Academy. Together, these initiatives form part of the company’s Impact Agenda 2030 framework, which spans climate, human impact, and equity commitments across its value chain.

Supporting documents

Click link to download and view these files