Puma avoids a restraining order in Roar lawsuit

2021-06-08T16:19:00

The federal court of New York for the Southern District has rejected a request for a temporary restraining order against Puma, which would have prevented it from using teeth designs on its apparel. The plaintiff, Christophe Roberts, claimed that various designs launched by the Wild Cat to address NBA customers ...

You’ve read your 2 free articles this month

Register  a free account or login  to unlock 3 more articles each week

SIGN-IN if you are already a subscriber of SGI Europe.

Gated access promo

Register today and unlock 3 more articles each week

See what industry leaders read every day:

  • Curated industry intelligence  you won’t find anywhere else—selected from 500+ sources
  • Exclusive interviews, case studies, and consumer insights  on emerging markets and trends
  • Expert analysis  on corporate moves, financials, retail trends, regulation, and innovation
  • The Daily Digest —essential sporting goods news delivered every morning

Register for free

Already a subscriber? Sign in

Ready for unlimited coverage?

Upgrade to Professional or Premium for unlimited access to exclusive reports,
C-suite interviews, market analysis, and industry-wide research—with team licensing included.

Compare subscription plans

Already registered? Sign in here