Puma avoids a restraining order in Roar lawsuit

The federal court of New York for the Southern District has rejected a request for a temporary restraining order against Puma, which would have prevented it from using teeth designs on its apparel. The plaintiff, Christophe Roberts, claimed that various designs launched by the Wild Cat to address NBA customers ...

Already an SGI Europe subscriber? Sign in here

Gated access promo

It’s time to get you onboard. Subscribe today!

  • Insights you won’t find anywhere else about sporting goods brands and retailers and the sporting goods market
  • Highly trusted business information you can rely on to make important decisions
  • Guest chronicles, interviews, insights from industry experts and leaders that are shaping the future of the industry


To continue reading this article Register Now. If you are interested in a Team or Corporate subscription, click here to find out more