Puma avoids a restraining order in Roar lawsuit
The federal court of New York for the Southern District has rejected a request for a temporary restraining order against Puma, which would have prevented it from using teeth designs on its apparel. The plaintiff, Christophe Roberts, claimed that various designs launched by the Wild Cat to address NBA customers ...
Keep reading this article by becoming a member
Already an SGI Europe subscriber? Sign in here
Enjoy full access to SGI Europe
To continue reading this article subscribe now for the following benefits:
- Unlimited access to our highly trusted industry insights and analysis
- Our executive edition of SGI Europe (released every 2 weeks) - the must-read for all leaders and decision makers in the industry
- Benchmark yourself against the market and competitors
- Find inspiration to drive your business forward
- Stay up to date with new business models and startups
- Guest chronicles, interviews, insights from industry experts and knowledge partners
- Case studies and best practises on business challenges
- Download interactive charts, data and analysis to integrate into your presentations
SUBSCRIBE NOW
for just 49€/month
Alternatively, try SGI Europe for 1€ for 30 days START YOUR 30-Day TRIAL NOW
________________
If you are interested in a Team or Corporate subscription, click here to find out more